Viral Video Sparks Debate After Man Claims Influential Abuja Men Approach Other Men for Relationships
By james ituru ·
Cover image
A Nigerian man's claims about receiving or witnessing romantic advances between men in Abuja have triggered discussion online, but the broader allegations made in the viral video remain unverified.
A video circulating on Nigerian social media has generated debate after a man alleged that some influential men in Abuja approach other men seeking romantic relationships and warned viewers about how they respond to such encounters.
The video attracted wider attention on Tuesday and Wednesday after being shared across social media and subsequently reported by several Nigerian entertainment and news websites.
In the footage, the unidentified speaker suggested that being approached by another man was something some men trying to establish themselves in Abuja could encounter.
He went as far as joking that a man who has never received such an approach in Abuja may not have "hustled" enough — a remark that quickly became one of the most widely repeated parts of the video.
However, his comments went beyond romantic propositions.
The speaker alleged that some of the people making such advances are wealthy or influential and cautioned men about how they respond if they find themselves in such a situation.
Man warns against confrontation
According to reports carrying the video, the speaker identified himself as Hausa/Fulani and claimed that men should avoid assuming they could simply confront or physically attack someone who approached them.
He suggested that the influence of some individuals could make confrontation risky.
Linda Ikeji's Blog reported that the man also advised people to preserve evidence of their interactions if they find themselves in such circumstances.
Similar accounts of the video were subsequently published by GistReel and eNews, both of which reported that the speaker warned viewers to be cautious when dealing with people he described as influential.
One of his more serious allegations was that a person who challenged a powerful individual could potentially find himself facing legal problems, with the speaker specifically referring to Kuje Prison.
He also made claims about people being manipulated after accepting food, gifts or assistance.
Those allegations have not been independently verified.
No person accused of engaging in such behaviour was named in the reports reviewed by Tokenpress, and no police report, court document or official statement was presented to substantiate the broader claims.
For that reason, the statements should be understood as allegations made by the individual in the viral video rather than evidence that such practices are widespread in Abuja.
Same video spreads across Nigerian websites
The story has travelled quickly through Nigeria's online media ecosystem.
An eNews report published on September 23 carried essentially the same account, while GistReel also reported the man's claims and referenced a version of the video circulated on X by an account named Somto Okonkwo.
IReporterOnline similarly reported the man's allegations but explicitly noted that they had not been independently verified and that he did not identify the people he was referring to.
That distinction is important because multiple websites reporting the same viral video do not necessarily provide independent confirmation of what the speaker alleges happened.
What can be confirmed is the existence and circulation of the video and the claims made by the speaker. The wider assertions about unnamed influential people cannot currently be independently established from the available evidence.
Nigeria's legal environment adds context
The conversation also takes place against Nigeria's restrictive legal environment concerning same-sex relationships.
Nigeria's Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act has been in force since 2014. Among other provisions, the law prohibits same-sex marriage and civil unions as well as certain public displays of same-sex relationships.
A 2026 update to UK government country information on Nigeria states that consensual same-sex sexual activity remains criminalised under Nigerian law and notes the absence of specific constitutional protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Nigeria's Constitution does provide broader protections against discrimination on grounds including ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion and political opinion, although sexual orientation is not expressly included in that constitutional provision.
These legal and social circumstances make claims involving sexuality particularly sensitive and reinforce the importance of distinguishing personal testimony from independently verified facts.
Online claims require caution
The episode is another example of how quickly personal accounts can become national talking points once a video gains traction on social media.
A person describing an experience on camera can provide potentially newsworthy testimony, but repetition across blogs and social platforms does not by itself verify the underlying allegation.
In this case, Tokenpress found several reports documenting substantially the same statements, but no independent evidence establishing how frequently men in Abuja receive such propositions, whether the unnamed individuals described by the speaker hold positions of influence, or whether anyone has been imprisoned as retaliation for rejecting an advance.
Until evidence or additional independently verifiable testimony emerges, those aspects of the story remain allegations.
The video nevertheless continues to generate discussion about relationships, personal boundaries, power and the risks that can arise when allegations involving influential individuals circulate publicly.
Continue with Tokenpress
Open Tokenpress to comment, contact the creator or send a tip.
Man warns against confrontation
According to reports carrying the video, the speaker identified himself as Hausa/Fulani and claimed that men should avoid assuming they could simply confront or physically attack someone who approached them.
He suggested that the influence of some individuals could make confrontation risky.
Linda Ikeji's Blog reported that the man also advised people to preserve evidence of their interactions if they find themselves in such circumstances.
Similar accounts of the video were subsequently published by GistReel and eNews, both of which reported that the speaker warned viewers to be cautious when dealing with people he described as influential.
One of his more serious allegations was that a person who challenged a powerful individual could potentially find himself facing legal problems, with the speaker specifically referring to Kuje Prison.
He also made claims about people being manipulated after accepting food, gifts or assistance.
Those allegations have not been independently verified.
No person accused of engaging in such behaviour was named in the reports reviewed by Tokenpress, and no police report, court document or official statement was presented to substantiate the broader claims.
For that reason, the statements should be understood as allegations made by the individual in the viral video rather than evidence that such practices are widespread in Abuja.
Same video spreads across Nigerian websites
The story has travelled quickly through Nigeria's online media ecosystem.
An eNews report published on September 23 carried essentially the same account, while GistReel also reported the man's claims and referenced a version of the video circulated on X by an account named Somto Okonkwo.
IReporterOnline similarly reported the man's allegations but explicitly noted that they had not been independently verified and that he did not identify the people he was referring to.
That distinction is important because multiple websites reporting the same viral video do not necessarily provide independent confirmation of what the speaker alleges happened.
What can be confirmed is the existence and circulation of the video and the claims made by the speaker. The wider assertions about unnamed influential people cannot currently be independently established from the available evidence.
Nigeria's legal environment adds context
The conversation also takes place against Nigeria's restrictive legal environment concerning same-sex relationships.
Nigeria's Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act has been in force since 2014. Among other provisions, the law prohibits same-sex marriage and civil unions as well as certain public displays of same-sex relationships.
A 2026 update to UK government country information on Nigeria states that consensual same-sex sexual activity remains criminalised under Nigerian law and notes the absence of specific constitutional protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Nigeria's Constitution does provide broader protections against discrimination on grounds including ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion and political opinion, although sexual orientation is not expressly included in that constitutional provision.
These legal and social circumstances make claims involving sexuality particularly sensitive and reinforce the importance of distinguishing personal testimony from independently verified facts.
Online claims require caution
The episode is another example of how quickly personal accounts can become national talking points once a video gains traction on social media.
A person describing an experience on camera can provide potentially newsworthy testimony, but repetition across blogs and social platforms does not by itself verify the underlying allegation.
In this case, Tokenpress found several reports documenting substantially the same statements, but no independent evidence establishing how frequently men in Abuja receive such propositions, whether the unnamed individuals described by the speaker hold positions of influence, or whether anyone has been imprisoned as retaliation for rejecting an advance.
Until evidence or additional independently verifiable testimony emerges, those aspects of the story remain allegations.
The video nevertheless continues to generate discussion about relationships, personal boundaries, power and the risks that can arise when allegations involving influential individuals circulate publicly.